%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : PUZ097^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n072.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 11:51:23 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 24.69s
% Output   : FiniteModel 24.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ097^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n072.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 23:41:48 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 24.69/13.00  Nitpicking formula...
% 24.69/13.00  Timestamp: 23:41:57
% 24.69/13.00  The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 24.69/13.00  able to skip some scopes
% 24.69/13.00  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 24.69/13.00  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 24.69/13.00  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 24.69/13.00    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 24.69/13.00    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 24.69/13.00    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 24.69/13.00    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 24.69/13.00    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 24.69/13.00  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 24.69/13.00  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 24.69/13.00  
% 24.69/13.00    Skolem constants:
% 24.69/13.00      ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xu = i1
% 24.69/13.00      ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xv = i1
% 24.69/13.00      ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xx1 = i1
% 24.69/13.00      ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xx2 = i2
% 24.69/13.00      ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xy1 = i1
% 24.69/13.00      ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xy2 = i2
% 24.69/13.00    Constants:
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_c1 = i2
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_c2 = i1
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_c3 = i1
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_c4 = i2
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_cCKB_H ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xx1 ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xy1 ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xu
% 24.69/13.00       ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xv
% 24.69/13.00        = True
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_cCKB_H ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xx2 ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xy2 ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xu
% 24.69/13.00       ??.bnd_cCKB_INJ.Xv
% 24.69/13.00        = True
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_g =
% 24.69/13.00        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.69/13.00        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2),
% 24.69/13.00         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1))
% 24.69/13.00      bnd_s = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1)
% 24.69/13.00  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 24.69/13.00  Total time: 1.2 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------